Coal - Truth and Consequence
February 08, 2012, 10:59:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTL deemed 'credible' fuel option despite drawbacks  (Read 623 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Denny Tyler
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 754



« on: April 15, 2008, 08:54:05 PM »

CTL drawbacks
The conference brought out drawbacks to CTL development, the greatest being the need to combine it with capture and storage of carbon dioxide, which the process emits. Producing diesel fuel from coal generates 850 g/mile of CO2 compared with 500 g/mile from oil and requires large quantities of water. Gasoline from coal also emits more greenhouse gases than gasoline from oil.

Cost is another drawback. Based on the experience of South Africa's Sasol, the cost of CTL was evaluated at $67-82/bbl, excluding the cost of CO2 capture.

"It is cheaper than extraheavy oil production," said Alain Quignard, who manages new projects and new motor fuel resources at IFP. He told OGJ: "From coal onwards, one finds the refining processes applied to heavy oil and deep conversion products."

CTL deemed 'credible' fuel option despite drawbacks
Logged

The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. ---- A bold onset is half the battle. ---- All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines | New Look by Nolt Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.175 seconds with 18 queries.